|Wow... Just wow
||[Sep. 22nd, 2005|01:35 am]
Pedos & Furries & Incest, Oh My!
wee__beastie__ is the personal soapbox of a woman who apparently thinks it is perfectly alright to fuck her dog every night.
WARNING!!!! There are MANY sick and possibly illegal pictures on that community. If your browser has the option to disable images, I suggest you do so before you venture into the madness.
NOOOOOOO!!!! MY EYESSSSS!!!!!!!! THEY BURN!!!
I assume that these chicks are too ugly to get laid...And that is why they have to fuck dogs.
QUICK! SOMEONE MAKE UP A FAKE LJ SO WE CAN INFILTRATE THEM AND LAUGH AT THEIR ANIMAL PORN-NESS!
Nothing (almost) shocks me anymore except the fact that people are shocked by this.
No one cares, except me.
Although, I'm not a zoophiliac, but I don't see how a dog fucking a person rather than a person sticking it in a dog, is hurting the animal in any way.
I guess some things just aren't meant to be understood.
The group is members-only now, guess that changed after you guys looked. I want to see whatever it is you're talking about so I applied for membership. I won't be submitting any pics though. I'm pretty sure that kind of stuff is illegal after all.
The pics posted in that community are illegal...Eye-gouging illegal.
Actually, I'm surprised that they haven't been banned from lj yet.
Is it that lesbian bestiality stuff? I come across that sometimes when I'm porn-surfing on kazaa. It's kind of strange... bestiality itself is legal in germany, but videotaping it isn't, or something...
Anyway, strange as it looks, if they're not HURTING the animal... I guess I don't see the problem. Some of the things really look like they're enjoying it. I saw this one where this lady was just lying there and it did it. If I were in the dog's place I'd probably do it too.
But in cases where they're forcing it (which I've seen) by putting it in and the animal just doesn't give a fuck (pun intended) then it's immoral and should be prosecuted as the creature obviously doesn't want it.
Then again, I've always been stringent on the issue. In crimes to humans, you get a higher sentence for murdering someone than you do raping them, right? Yet with animals, it seems like killing one is nothing at all compared to breaking the biblical code and having sex. You can butcher cattle and chickens by the millions and drain their blood into gutters, but some fetishist can't have gentle love or anything? It just seems strange... I could understand if we're a nation of vegetarians maybe... but we're not... we're butchers...
Forced bestiality is a definite no no...
And you can't really know weather an animal wants it or not, unless you speak dog, stick to your own species.
Yeah, I'm a vegetarian myself, and I do have a problem with the whole meat industry.
Well, lesbian beastiality is weird. See, they're lesbians... they hate human men... but they seem to consider it lesbian doing it with male dogs. I think they consider them dildos or something like that. They don't seem to care for the dog at all, they treat it like an object. I'm very much against this.
Honestly, I don't think it's proven that when animals have sex among their own species that they 'want it'. Many times animals resist, or just submit because they're tired of resisting. We don't stop this. We do not stop animal rape, in fact it's almost as if we encourage it. So, I don't think lack of consent is really a good reason. Animals have never had to give consent (and honestly, except perhaps for some rare chimps and dolphins, haven't shown the capacity for intelligence to do so in our language). What can be done is by consulting animal behaviourologists (made that word up since I lack knowledge of the term), figure out the signs so it can be obvious whether or not the act is causing the animal pleasure or discomfort. Only the former should be allowed.
I'm somewhat torn on the whole meat issue. I enjoy eating meat and realize that animals produce certain things in more focused quantities than we can get from eating plants (like DHA in fish, for example, which takes longer to produce from baser EFAs from stuff like flax) as well as whole protein sources (though you could probably get that from isolated whey protein rather than killing, or soy, though soy's controversial to me).
Even so, I think it's stupid to prevent people from having sex with animals as long as its legal to butcher them. I think we should start off by concretely defining separate animal rights for different species. People aren't going to give up their cows and chickens, that's not the first battle you want to start with. We need to define the varying levels of conciousness and usefulness to humans (alive) as well as the emotional impact humanity associates with an animal's death on average. We can start off by protecting dogs and cats, since most people do not want to eat them. In fact, protecting carnivorous animals as a whole should be much easier since arguments can be made about them being higher on the food chain and lacking any specificly useful nutritious value. Once there, you can move into animals which share similar characteristics like... dolphins. No eating the dolphins :)